Chadder’s, the tiny Utah burger chain that In-N-Out sued in 2007, may look a lot like everybody’s favorite restaurant — the menu is practically identical, and so is the decor — but it’s actually more expensive and less tasty, Rhombus Magazine found:
There was a bun, meat, cheese, onions, lettuce and tomato, which combined to make a marginally tasty burger. The meat patties were a lot smaller than expected, but when you are dealing with a knock-off you learn to expect to be unimpressed. …
The fries were just like those of In-N-Out except smaller and not as crisp. …
Chadder’s is a shoddy clone of In-N-Out. Do I recommend that you eat there? If the word “cliché” describes your lifestyle, then yes, go for it. If you really want a good original burger, then don’t.”
Read the entire review to see the writer’s take on founder Chad Stubbs’ weak explanation for why he opened the wannabe In-N-Outs.
October 7, 2009 at 8:08 am |
I have had the unfortuniate pleasure of working for Chadders. Mr Stubbs is a real want-a-be resturanture, he’ll never make it. When He tells you the potatoes are going to sugar, well, I rest my case. Maybe he needed to go back to 6th grade basic chemistry class, they go to starch. Why do you think you can light a light bulb with simple wire and a whole potato? The best asked question is “Where’s the Beef”, there is more bread, lettuce, tomato and sauce than meat!!!!
November 21, 2009 at 5:20 pm |
do you know his ex-wife?